Legal Opinion

United States v. David Leonti

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 24, 2003No. 01-17113PublishedCited by 134 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, Circuit Judge.

We confront an issue of first impression in this circuit: whether a viable ineffective assistance of counsel claim can arise in the sentencing context; specifically, whether failing to effectively assist a defendant awaiting sentencing in his willing efforts to provide cooperation to an interested government can constitute a Sixth Amendment violation. Concluding that the pre sentencing cooperation period is a critical stage of the criminal process and that obtaining a substantial assistance motion from the government represents a particularly critical point…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Blackledge v. AllisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by134 opinions

  1. United States v. Jeffrey Dean HowardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
  2. United States v. Kwok Chee Kwan, AKA Jeff KwanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  3. Osagiede v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  4. Daniel Chavez v. David RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  5. United States v. JuvenileCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003

129 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API