United States v. David Leonti
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, Circuit Judge.
We confront an issue of first impression in this circuit: whether a viable ineffective assistance of counsel claim can arise in the sentencing context; specifically, whether failing to effectively assist a defendant awaiting sentencing in his willing efforts to provide cooperation to an interested government can constitute a Sixth Amendment violation. Concluding that the pre sentencing cooperation period is a critical stage of the criminal process and that obtaining a substantial assistance motion from the government represents a particularly critical point…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Blackledge v. AllisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Kirby v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by134 opinions
- United States v. Jeffrey Dean HowardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Kwok Chee Kwan, AKA Jeff KwanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- Osagiede v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Daniel Chavez v. David RobinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- United States v. JuvenileCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
129 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.