Charles Nelson Co. v. Pillsbury
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
KERRIGAN, District Judge.
The question presented by these three cases is the proper basis upon which to compute compensation due under the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (33 USCA §§ 901-950) to an employee who has not worked at the same employment for substantially the whole of the year preceding his injury. The Commission has fixed 270 days worked as the measure of “substantially the whole” of the preceding year, and in each of the present cases the injured employee had worked less than 270 days in the year preceding his injury.
The statutory provisions applicable are…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Andrew F. Mahony Co. v. MarshallDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1931
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hardy Johnson v. Theodore Britton, Deputy Commissioner, Bureau of Employees' Compensation, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961
- Pacific S. S. Co. v. PillsburyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1931
- Pillsbury v. Charles Nelson Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1932
- Hardy Johnson v. Theodore Britton, Deputy Commissioner, Bureau of Employees' Compensation, United States Department of LaborCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1961