Scharnhorst v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SHANGLER, Judge.
The movant Schamhorst appeals from an order which denied his Rule 27.26 motion to vacate judgment and sentence after an evi-dentiary hearing. Schamhorst was charged by information with receiving stolen property [§ 570.080, RSMo 1978] and as a persistent offender, punishable by an extended term [§ 558.016.3, RSMo Supp. 1984]. The information alleged seven specific prior felony convictions as the basis for the allegation of the persistent offender status. Schamhorst pleaded guilty to receiving stolen property and, under the terms of a plea bargain agreement, was sentenced to a…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hill v. LockhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Murphy v. CarronSupreme Court of Missouri · 1976
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. JenningsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- State v. GreenMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- Sharp v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
- Hight v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- State v. TincherMissouri Court of Appeals · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.