Legal Opinion

State v. Tincher

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided September 6, 1990No. 16413PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WASSERSTROM, Senior Judge.

A jury found defendant guilty of burglary in the second degree, and the trial judge sentenced him to imprisonment for twelve years as a persistent offender. Defendant appeals, asserting as error: (1) insufficiency of the evidence; and (2) failure of the trial judge to find that defendant was a persistent offender prior to the submission of the case to the jury.

I

Sufficiency of the Evidence

In reviewing the sufficiency of the evidence, an appellate court considers the facts and all inferences therefrom in a light most favorable to the State and rejects all contrary…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. State v. RoddenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1987
  2. State v. WynnMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. State v. McGlatherySupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
  4. Garzee v. SauroSupreme Court of Missouri · 1982
  5. State Ex Inf. North Todd Gentry v. LamarSupreme Court of Missouri · 1927

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. TeerSupreme Court of Missouri · 2009
  2. State v. CullenMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. State v. AndersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Dudley v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. State v. McLaughlinMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API