Legal Opinion

Shepherd v. Eric Schuster Corporation

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 31, 1968No. 64PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARRON, Justice.

Eric Schuster Corporation, a manufacturer of picture frames and moldings, brought this suit against Don Shepherd to recover the contract price of $3,373.75 for about 400 picture frames shipped to and allegedly accepted by Actino Galleries, Inc., under two guaranty agreements signed by Don Shepherd. Actino Galleries, Inc., hereinafter called Actino, was an insolvent corporation domiciled in New Jersey at the time and Don Shepherd was a stockholder therein who was interested in the success of Actino, but who did not actively participate in the business. Eric Schus-ter…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. O'CONNOR v. GraggTexas Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Southwest Savings Association v. DunaganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  3. Jarecki Mfg. Co. v. HindsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1927
  4. Straus-Frank Co. v. HughesTexas Commission of Appeals · 1941
  5. Aultman & Taylor Co. v. HefnerTexas Supreme Court · 1886

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Attayi, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
  2. United States v. Vahlco Corporation, and Frederick Henry Vahlsing, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
  3. Joseph Thomas, Inc. v. Graham, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1992
  4. Liberty National Bank and Trust Co. v. DvorakNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1972
  5. Playboy Enterprises, Inc. v. Javier Sanchez-CampuzCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API