Legal Opinion

Straus-Frank Co. v. Hughes

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided November 12, 1941No. 2357-7613PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HICKMAN, Commissioner.

In the trial court plaintiff in error, Straus-Frank Company, recovered judgment against O. L. McShan and J. B. Mc-Shan for the principal, interest and attorney’s fees upon a promissory note executed to it by them on' November 1, 1934. In the same action it also recovered judgment against defendant in error, S. W. Hughes, for the same amount, less attorney’s fees, upon a letter of guaranty, which is set out below. The McShans did not appeal and the judgment as to them has long since become final. On Hughes’ appeal the Court of Civil Appeals reversed the judgment of the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bedford v. KelleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Gay v. WardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1895
  3. Home National Bank v. Estate of WatermanIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Merchants' National Bank v. CresseySupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  5. National Eagle Bank v. HuntSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1888

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. v. Attayi, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
  2. McKnight v. Virginia Mirror CompanyTexas Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Austin Hardwoods, Inc. v. Vanden Berghe, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1996
  4. Southwest Savings Association v. DunaganCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  5. Vastine v. Bank of DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1991

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API