Legal Opinion

Aultman & Taylor Co. v. Hefner

Texas Supreme Court

Decided November 26, 1886No. 2103PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Appeal from Hunt. Tried below before the Hon. J. A. B, Putman.

1Opinion of the Court

Stayton, Associate Justice.

This action was brought to recover on three promissory notes, executed to the appellant, by the appellee Heffner, to secure the purchase money for machinery sold to the latter by the former, and to foreclose a chattel mortgage made to secure the notes. One of the notes was signed by the defendant Davenport, and the three notes bore indorsements which showed that the defendants, Bowser & Lemon, “ for value received, waiving presentment for payment, protest, and notice thereof, guaranteed the payment of the notes at maturity or any time thereafter.”

The purchase of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Blythe v. SpeaksTexas Supreme Court · 1859
  2. Brantley v. ThomasTexas Supreme Court · 1858

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Melody Home Manufacturing Co. v. MorrisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
  2. Planters' Cotton Oil Co. v. Whitesboro Cotton Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1912
  3. Green v. ConradSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  4. Southern Gas & Gasoline Engine Co. v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  5. Dawson v. WardTexas Supreme Court · 1888

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API