Legal Opinion
O'CONNOR v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided June 4, 2003No. 91A02-0203-PC-252PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHARPNACK, Judge.
Mark O'Connor appeals the trial court's denial of his motion to correct erroneous sentence as it relates to his convictions under Cause No. 91D01-9507-CF-94 ("CEF-94") and Cause No. 91D01-9507-CF-95 ("CF-95") and the revocation of his probation under Cause No. 91D01-9310-CF-131 ("CF-131"). O'Connor raises two issues, which we restate as:
I. Whether O'Connor was subjected to multiple punishments for the same offense in violation of the prohibition against double jeopardy when he entered into an agreed entry with respect to a forfeiture action and entered into a plea…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. UrserySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Richardson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
- Mitchell v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Flowers v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- v. JenningsColorado Court of Appeals · 2021
- C.R.M. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003
- State v. ShacklefordIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- CRM v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003