Legal Opinion

C.R.M. v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 4, 2003No. 42A05-0304-JV-204PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MAY, Judge.

C.R.M. appeals the denial of his motion to dismiss the State's petition alleging de-linquencey. He raises one issue, which we restate as whether the delinquency petition subjects him to double jeopardy when, based on the same possession of marijuana, he had already been subjected to a forfeiture proceeding under Ind.Code § 34-24-1-1.1 We affirm and remand for delinquency proceedings.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On April 26, 2002, three police officers conducted an investigation at Vincennes Lincoln High School. In the pocket of C.R.M.'s pants, which were hanging in a gym…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Austin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. United States v. UrserySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  5. Department of Revenue of Mont. v. Kurth RanchSupreme Court of the United States · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. OlsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. CRM v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API