Legal Opinion

McNally v. DEPARTMENT OF PATH

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided August 11, 2011No. 09-450PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

¶ 1. Claimant Joanna. McNally seeks costs and attorney’s fees that she incurred in her appeal to this Court, which resulted in our remanding the matter for the Commissioner of Labor to make necessary findings and conclusions and to apply the appropriate law. McNally v. Dep't of PATH, 2010 VT 99, 189 Vt. 515, 13 A.3d 656 (mem.). Upon consideration of the parties’ arguments, we grant claimant’s request for an award of $1079 in costs and $13, 599 in attorney’s fees.

¶2. Before examining claimant’s request, we review the history of this ease. In 2007 and 2008, claimant experienced pain in her…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial HospitalArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Hodgeman v. Jard Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  5. Prime Insurance Syndicate, Inc. v. Soil Tech Distributors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lathrop Limited Partnership IIVermont Superior Court · 2014
  2. McNally v. DEPARTMENT OF PATHSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API