Legal Opinion

Hodgeman v. Jard Co.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided October 25, 1991No. 90-263PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGibson, J.

Defendant Jard Company, Inc. appeals an award of attorney’s fees to plaintiff Patricia Hodgeman by the Commissioner of Labor and Industry in a workers’ compensation proceeding. Defendant argues that the controlling statute, 21 V.S.A. § 678(a), violates Chapter I, Article 7 of the Vermont Constitution. Alternatively, defendant argues (1) that workers’ compensation claimants must prevail on all claims in order to be awarded attorney’s fees, (2) that the commissioner abused her discretion in awarding fees without finding that defendant was responsible for unreasonable delay, and (3) that there…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bruntaeger v. ZellerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1986
  2. Vincent v. Vermont State Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
  3. State v. Ludlow Supermarkets, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  4. Montgomery v. Brinver Corp.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1983
  5. Morrisseau v. LegacSupreme Court of Vermont · 1962

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Baker v. StateSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  2. In Re Appeals of LetourneauSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
  3. Chittenden Town School District v. Department of EducationSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  4. Wood v. Fletcher Allen Health CareSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  5. Corn v. New Mexico Educators Federal Credit UnionNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API