Legal Opinion

McNally v. DEPARTMENT OF PATH

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided August 11, 2011No. 09-450Published

1Opinion of the Court

31 A.3d 333 (2011)

2011 VT 93

Joanna McNALLY

v.

DEPARTMENT OF PATH.

No. 09-450.

Supreme Court of Vermont.

August 11, 2011.

Present: DOOLEY, JOHNSON, SKOGLUND, JJ., REIBER, C.J. and BURGESS, J.

ENTRY ORDER

¶ 1. Claimant Joanna McNally seeks costs and attorney's fees that she incurred in her appeal to this Court, which resulted in our remanding the matter for the Commissioner of Labor to make necessary findings and conclusions and to apply the appropriate law. McNally v. Dep't of PATH, 2010 VT 99, 189 Vt. ___, 13 A.3d 656 (mem.). Upon consideration of the parties' arguments, we grant claimant's request…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v. West Virginia Dept. of Health and Human ResourcesSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
  2. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Hewitt v. HelmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Hanrahan v. HamptonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Wagenseller v. Scottsdale Memorial HospitalArizona Supreme Court · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API