Smith v. Meemic Insurance
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtShapiro, J.
In this case involving the uninsured motorist provisions of an automobile insurance policy sold by defendant to plaintiff, plaintiff appeals as of right from the trial court’s order granting defendant’s motion for summary disposition. We reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. This appeal has been decided without oral argument pursuant to MCR 7.214(E).
The facts in this case are undisputed. Plaintiff was injured in an automobile accident in which it appeared that the other driver, Victoriano Gonzales, was uninsured. Plaintiff notified deféndant and claimed…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
- Sweebe v. SweebeMichigan Supreme Court · 2006
- Lee v. Auto-Owners InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
- People v. DaneMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
- Van Renselaer v. WhitingMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Detroit Club Holdings LLC v. Jay EdwardMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
- Detroit Club Holdings LLC v. Jay EdwardMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019