Legal Opinion

Classen v. Irving Healthcare System

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1995No. D-4597PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

Carol Classen sued her former employer, Irving Healthcare System, alleging that it discharged her in retaliation for pursuing a claim for workers’ compensation benefits. Such retaliation, if it occurred, would be prohibited by what was then article 8307c, Tex. Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann., and is now codified as sections 451.001-.008 of the Labor Code. Irving Healthcare System is a municipal hospital authority created by the City of Irving pursuant to then article 4437e(3), Tex.Rev. Civ.StatAnn. now section 262.003 of the Health and Safety Code. It is thus a governmental entity and as such, immune from…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of LaPorte v. BarfieldTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Classen v. Irving Healthcare System, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1993

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Edinburg Hospital Authority v. TreviñoTexas Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Harris County v. Louvier, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997
  3. Aerobic Maintenance & Service, Inc. v. First United Bank & Trust Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2009
  4. Aerobic Maintenance & Service, Inc. v. First United Bank & Trust Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2009
  5. Aerobic Maintenance & Service, Inc. v. First United Bank & Trust Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API