Legal Opinion
In Re Colacasides
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided March 14, 1967No. Docket 3,302PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
On Application por Bail.
2Per curiam
Pursuant to the provisions of Michigan’s one-man grand jury law, CL 1948, § 767.3 et seq., as amended (Stat Ann 1954 Rev and Stat Ann 1965 Cum Supp § 28.943 et seq.), appellant (Colacasides) was granted immunity from subsequent prosecution for any offense concerning which his answers to certain questions may have tended to incriminate him — the questions being stated in the order granting immunity entered by the grand juror, Judge George B. Bowles of Wayne circuit. See CLS 1961, § 767.6 (Stat Ann 1954 Rev § 28.946). Colacasides, nevertheless, refused to answer the…
3Cases cited10 opinions
- Murphy v. Waterfront Commission of New York HarborSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Garrity v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Spevack v. KleinSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Ullmann v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by13 opinions
- Manning Engineering, Inc. v. Hudson County Park CommissionSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
- Floyd Bloss v. People of the State of Michigan, James K. Miller and Ronald ParsonsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1970
- In Re ColacasidesMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
- People v. KurzMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
- Jaikins v. JaikinsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.