Legal Opinion

Goldberg v. Maine Asphalt Road Corp.

District Court, D. Maine

Decided July 9, 1962No. Civ. No. 7-55; Civ. Nos. 1363, 1364PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GIGNOUX, District Judge.

These three cases present the same question, and therefore are considered together. Each is an action brought under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended, 29 U.S.C.A. § 201 et seq., to enjoin violation of the overtime and record-keeping provisions of the Act. 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 207, 211(c), 215(a) (1), (2) and (5), 217. Plaintiff also seeks the restraint of any withholding of payment of overtime compensation found by the Court to be due to employees under the Act. 29 U.S.C.A. § 217.

The parties are in agreement that during all periods material to these…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. Goldberg v. Whitaker House Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  3. Walling v. Helmerich & Payne, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
  4. Walling v. Youngerman-Reynolds Hardwood Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Bay Ridge Operating Co. v. AaronSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Huntington Memorial Hospital v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  2. Reich v. Bay, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API