Legal Opinion

Casey v. Byrd

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 14, 1963No. 675PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSharp, J.

A scaffold, designed to be used by workmen painting a ceiling twenty-five to thirty feet above the floor, is an inherently dangerous instrument if not properly constructed. One who contracts to furnish a scaffold for such a purpose owes to those for whose use it is provided the duty to use proper care in its construction and to supply a reasonably safe structure. Odum v. Oil Co., 213 N.C. 478, 196 S.E. 823; Cathey v. Construction Co., 218 N.C. 525, 11 S.E. 2d 571; Williams v. Stores Co., Inc., 209 N.C. 591, 184 S.E. 496.

The rule applicable to this case is stated in Annotation: Contractor’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Devlin v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
  2. Coughtry v. . Globe Woolen Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
  3. Williams v. . Stores Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  4. Petty v. Cranston Print Works CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  5. Gray v. Boston, Revere Beach & Lynn RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Cowan v. Laughridge Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  2. Britt v. Mallard-Griffin, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
  3. Pike v. D.A. Fiore Construction Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API