Casey v. Byrd
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtSharp, J.
A scaffold, designed to be used by workmen painting a ceiling twenty-five to thirty feet above the floor, is an inherently dangerous instrument if not properly constructed. One who contracts to furnish a scaffold for such a purpose owes to those for whose use it is provided the duty to use proper care in its construction and to supply a reasonably safe structure. Odum v. Oil Co., 213 N.C. 478, 196 S.E. 823; Cathey v. Construction Co., 218 N.C. 525, 11 S.E. 2d 571; Williams v. Stores Co., Inc., 209 N.C. 591, 184 S.E. 496.
The rule applicable to this case is stated in Annotation: Contractor’s…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Devlin v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1882
- Coughtry v. . Globe Woolen Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
- Williams v. . Stores Co., Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
- Petty v. Cranston Print Works CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
- Gray v. Boston, Revere Beach & Lynn RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Cowan v. Laughridge Construction Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Britt v. Mallard-Griffin, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1968
- Pike v. D.A. Fiore Construction Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009