Legal Opinion

Britt v. Mallard-Griffin, Inc.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 15, 1968No. 68SC128PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

The plaintiff, having gone to the defendant’s place of business for the purpose of purchasing building supplies and having made his purchase, asked for and received permission to use the saw to prepare his purchase for his use.

Having given permission to the plaintiff to use the saw, the defendant owed a duty to the plaintiff to warn him of any hidden dangers or unsafe conditions of which the defendant knew or in the exercise of reasonable supervision and inspection should have known and which were unknown to the plaintiff. The condition of the saw and the premises surrounding the saw were…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hedrick Ex Rel. Hedrick v. TigniereSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. Casey v. ByrdSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hull v. Winn-Dixie Greenville, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Quinn v. P & Q SUPERMARKET, INC.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API