Legal Opinion

Capul v. Fleet Bank of Maine

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided June 30, 1997PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DANA, Justice.

[¶ 1] Placido “Paul” Capul and his corporation, Elpla, Inc., (hereinafter referred to collectively as Capul) appeal from the judgment entered in the Superior Court (Penobscot County, Marden J.) on a jury verdict finding Fleet Bank of Maine not liable to Capul for fraudulent misrepresentation, fraudulent nondisclosure, conversion, wrongful interference with an advantageous relationship, and negligent misrepresentation. Capul contends that the court erred when it (1) concluded that Fleet did not owe him a duty of care in regard to a 1988 subordination agreement; (2) allowed Fleet…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. Gordon G. Atwell, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
  2. Joy v. Eastern Maine Medical CenterSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1987
  3. Bowden v. GrindleSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
  4. Fish v. PaulSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1990
  5. Adamatic v. Progressive Baking Co., Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1995

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. AlmurshidySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1999
  2. Leaf v. BeihofferColorado Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. State of Maine v. Abdirahman H. Haji-HassanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
  4. State v. Haji-HassanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2018
  5. Bank of America, N.A. v. BarrSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API