Legal Opinion
Bowden v. Grindle
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine
Decided December 20, 1994PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DANA, Justice.
Ruth D. Bowden appeals from a judgment entered in the Superior Court (Hancock County, Mead, J.) contending that the court erred by its determination that the court was bound by the advisory jury verdict that the statute of limitations barred her claim for rescission of a deed given to Edward B. and Prudence E. Grindle. The Grindles cross-appeal, contending that if Bowden prevails, they should not be bound by the judgment on their counterclaim for unjust enrichment. We vacate the judgment.
Bowden conveyed title to her farm in Blue Hill to the Grindles, reserving a life estate to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- City of Auburn v. MandarelliSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1974
- A.F.A.B., Inc. v. Town of Old Orchard BeachSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- Aladdin Electric Associates v. Town of Old Orchard BeachSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994
- Morris v. Resolution Trust Corp.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
- A.F.A.B., Inc. v. Town of Old Orchard BeachSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Paffhausen v. BalanoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
- June Roberts Agency, Inc. v. Venture Properties, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1996
- Forrest Associates v. Passamaquoddy TribeSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2000
- Maine Municipal Employees Health Trust v. MaloneySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2004
- Carvel Co. v. Spencer Press, Inc.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1998
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.