Legal Opinion

State v. Stukes

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided November 5, 2002No. COA01-1565PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TYSON, Judge.

The State appeals from Judge Lanier’s order granting defendant’s motion for appropriate relief on the basis of newly discovered evidence. We affirm.

I. Facts

Stevie Odell Stukes, (“defendant”), was tried and found guilty of first degree murder, robbery with a dangerous weapon, and discharging a weapon into occupied property. The State’s evidence tended to show that LaLa Faison was visiting with J.W. Merritt (“victim”) on a dirt road near Wallace, North Carolina. Faison saw a man known as “Pokey” in a car parked on the side of the road. Daniel Williams stood with Pokey and held a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. EasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1991
  2. State v. BrittSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1987
  3. State v. WigginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  4. State v. PattersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  5. State v. BrunoCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  2. State v. HowardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  3. State v. HallCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  4. State v. WilliamsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  5. State v. RhodesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API