Britt v. Britt
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WEBB, Justice.
The plaintiffs did not appeal from the judgment dismissing their claim for a parol trust and that question is not before us.
The appeal of the plaintiff Betsy Britt brings to the Court questions involving unjust enrichment and fraud. The Restatement of Restitution § 1 lays down the general principle that “a person who has been unjustly enriched at the expense of another is required to make restitution.” In order to establish a claim for unjust enrichment, a party must have conferred a benefit on the other party. The benefit must not have been conferred officiously, that is it…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Johnson v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Vetco Concrete Company v. TROY LUMBER COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Williams v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Hoyle v. BagbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- Wright v. WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Krawiec v. ManlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
- Booe v. ShadrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- Myers & Chapman v. Thomas G. EvansSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
- Food Lion, Inc. v. Capital Cities/ABC, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Norman Owen Trucking, Inc. v. MorkoskiCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.