Legal Opinion

Britt v. Britt

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 3, 1987No. 566PA86PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Justice.

The plaintiffs did not appeal from the judgment dismissing their claim for a parol trust and that question is not before us.

The appeal of the plaintiff Betsy Britt brings to the Court questions involving unjust enrichment and fraud. The Restatement of Restitution § 1 lays down the general principle that “a person who has been unjustly enriched at the expense of another is required to make restitution.” In order to establish a claim for unjust enrichment, a party must have conferred a benefit on the other party. The benefit must not have been conferred officiously, that is it…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Vetco Concrete Company v. TROY LUMBER COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Williams v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Hoyle v. BagbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  5. Wright v. WrightSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1982

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Krawiec v. ManlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2018
  2. Booe v. ShadrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  3. Myers & Chapman v. Thomas G. EvansSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  4. Food Lion, Inc. v. Capital Cities/ABC, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
  5. Norman Owen Trucking, Inc. v. MorkoskiCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API