Legal Opinion

Bier v. City of New Philadelphia

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 13, 1984No. 83-1486PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Per curiam

The court of appeals affirmed the grant of summary judgment in the present case stating in its opinion that it found “no support in this record for the plaintiffs-appellants’ claim that the defendants-appellees’ breach proximately caused plaintiff’s [sic] unquestionable injury.” The case of Piqua v. Morris (1918), 98 Ohio St. 42, is still the law in Ohio concerning torts which are the proximate cause of an act of God concurrent with the negligence of a defendant. In Morris the court stated in paragraph one of the syllabus:

“The proximate cause of a result is that which in a natural and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Lodwicks & Kennedy v. Ohio InsuranceOhio Supreme Court · 1832
  2. Majoros v. Cleveland Interurban Rd. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Helton v. Scioto County Board of CommissionersOhio Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. In Re Richardson-Merrell, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1985
  3. Korengel v. Little Miami Golf Ctr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2019
  4. Am. Water Mgmt. Servs., LLC v. Div. of Oil & Gas Res. Mgmt., Court of Appeals of Ohio, Tenth District, Franklin County2018
  5. Arndt v. P M Ltd., 2007-P-0038 (5-9-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API