Legal Opinion

Majoros v. Cleveland Interurban Rd. Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1933No. 24089PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

When the Court of Appeals reversed the trial court for failure to direct a verdict in favor of the defendant below, as indicated in its journal entry, it became the duty of the reviewing court to render the judgment that the trial court should have rendered. It should have rendered final judgment instead of remanding the cause to the trial court for further proceedings. Such procedure is authorized by Section 12272, General Code, and is the procedure usually followed by the reviewing courts, including our own. A case exactly similar to this is Metzger Seed & Oil Co. v. Berg, 84 Ohio St., 485,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jacob Laub Baking Co. v. MiddletonOhio Supreme Court · 1928

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bier v. City of New PhiladelphiaOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Lakeside Hospital v. KovarOhio Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Leighton v. Hower Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Greyhound Lines, Inc. v. MartinOhio Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Jusko v. Youngstown & Northern Rd.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API