Legal Opinion

MILLS AND FEDERAL MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. Judd

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 10, 1969No. [No. 95, September Term, 1969.]PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinan, J.

This case is before us on appeal from a decision of the Circuit Court for Washington County which held that a policy of insurance written by the defendant-appellant, Federal Mutual Insurance Company (Company), did provide liability coverage for defendant-appellant, Gary Lee Mills, a minor, who through the negligent operation of an automobile had caused injury to the plaintiff-appellee, Regina Judd, in an accident occurring in West Virginia. The facts before us are not in dispute but rather the legal interpretation which should be given to them.

Bruce Mills, Gary’s father, had obtained a public…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hoosier Cas. Co. of Indianapolis, Ind. v. FoxDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1952
  2. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. McConnaughyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  3. Citizens Casualty Co. v. Allied Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1958
  4. Seaford v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. WestDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1957

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pacific Indemnity Co. v. Interstate Fire & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
  2. Truck Insurance Exchange v. Marks Rentals, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  3. Keystone Insurance v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  4. Wehland v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1971
  5. National Indemnity Co. v. National Union Fire InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API