Legal Opinion

(PC) Cortes-Salcedo v. Jaegel

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 17, 2020No. 2:20-cv-00048Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARTIN J. CORTES-SALCEDO, No. 2:20-cv-0048 DB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 CITY OF REDDING, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is a county inmate proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims that officers used excessive force against him when they arrested 19 him. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 4) 20 and his first amended complaint for screening complaint (ECF No. 10) for screening. For the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API