Hodges v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGuerry, J.
1. An indictment which in the language of the Code charges the offense of maintaining and operating a lottery, and specifies or names the kind of lottery being operated, is sufficient, and is good as against demurrer. Kolshorn v. State, 97 Ga. 343 (23 S. E. 829); Guthas v. State, 54 Ga. App. 217 (187 S. E. 847); Roberts v. State, 54 Ga. App. 704 (188 S. E. 844).
2. The evidence was sufficient to support the verdict. After a' careful consideration of the assignments of error in respect to admission of certain evidence, we find no such error as would require a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Broyles,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kolshorn v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Guthas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Roberts v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hodges v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
- President v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1951
- Ramsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
- Howard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
- Clay v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.