Guthas v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the CourtGuerry, J.
1. An indictment which charges that the, defendant did “keep, maintain, employ, and carry on a lottery, the same being a scheme or device for the hazarding of money, by selling tickets which represented chances on prizes in lottery, known and designated as the ‘number game,’ ” is legally sufficient without specifying or describing with more particularity how such game was operated. Kolshorn v. State, 97 Ga. 343 (23 S. E. 829). The indictment was not subject to the demurrer.
2. Evidence for the State disclosed the discovery, by officers, of some 2000 tickets in the home of the defendant, which…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cole v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Kolshorn v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
- Crawford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
- Jones v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1924
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1927
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Lunsford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
- Turk v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
- Moore v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- Hodges v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.