Legal Opinion

Clay v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 16, 1956No. 36368PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carlisle, J. 1.

An accusation which charges that the defendant “did then and there unlawfully keep, maintain, employ and carry on a certain lottery, scheme and device for the hazarding of money, said lottery, scheme and device being known as and called ‘the bug’ and ‘number game' contrary to the laws of said State the good order, peace and dignity thereof,” is legally sufficient without specifying or describing with more particu*554larity how such game was operated. Guthas v. State, 54 Ga. App. 217 (187 S. E. 847); Kolshorn v. State, 97 Ga. 343 (23 S. E. 829); Moore v. State, 54 Ga. App. 218, 220…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Andrews v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1903
  2. Lunsford v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  3. Turk v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1937
  4. Kolshorn v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1895
  5. Guthas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Story v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1957
  2. Chilivis v. FlemingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API