William Deering & Co. v. Cunningham
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Montgomery district'court; A. H. Skid-more, judge.
1Opinion of the Court
*175The opinion of the court was delivered by
Johnston, J.:
This was an action to recover upon a promissory note for $100, bearing interest at the rate of ten per cent, per annum from date, given by J. C. and Mary E. Cunningham to Maud L. Sherrill. It is one of a series of notes given in pursuance of an agreement, of which the following is a copy :
“This Agreement, Made and entered into by and between J. C. Cunningham, and E. Sherrill and Maud L. Sherrill, witnesseth :
“That the said E. Sherrill is to dismiss, at his cost, the suit now pending in the state of Illinois entitled E. Sherrill against…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Oscanyan v. Arms Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
- Trist v. ChildSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Marshall v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1854
- Tool Co. v. NorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1865
- Milbank v. . JonesNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Jamison v. FlannerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
- Bell v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1935
- Spaulding v. MailletMontana Supreme Court · 1920
- Gordon v. Gordon's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916
- Stoskopf v. StoskopfSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.