Legal Opinion

Frye v. Town of Mount Vernon

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1906No. 5751PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Skagit county, Joiner, J., entered January 31, 1905, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, after a trial on the merits, in a proceeding by a warrant holder to compel a city to make a reassessment to pay the cost of a local improvement.

1Opinion of the CourtCrow, J.

— This is a proceeding by mandamus to compel appellants, as councilmen of the town of Mount Vernon, to reassess certain real estate for the purpose of creating a special fund to pay outstanding warrants held by respondent, which had been issued to pay for the improvement of Third street, in said town, and which were unpaid for want of funds.

Upon trial, the court, at the request of respondent, made findings of fact from which it appears, that said town is a municipal corporation of the fourth class; that appellants are the elected, qualified, and acting members of the town council; that on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Hemen v. City of BallardWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Lewis v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Young v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Bowman v. City of ColfaxWashington Supreme Court · 1897
  5. City of Spokane v. StevensWashington Supreme Court · 1895

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Shaw & Hodgins v. WaldronWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Brown v. PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  3. State ex rel. Seymour v. SlaterWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Cowan v. State Ex Rel. BlancharWyoming Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Lewis County v. McCutcheonWashington Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API