Legal Opinion
Williams v. Ashland Chemical Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided July 13, 1976No. 76AP-11PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHolmes, J.
The appeal of this case, and the other consolidated cases considered concurrently herein, represents another phase of the considerably complex legal issues presented in a number of civil actions for damages brought by the employees or former employees of the Columbus Coated Fabrics, a division of defendant Borden, Inc. These actions seek damages for serious physical injuries received by these plaintiff employees, occasioned by the use of the allegedly dangerous chemicals known as MBK and MEK, in the course of their employment within the manufacturing process of Columbus Coated Fabrics.
The…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- American Mut. Liability Ins. Co. v. MatthewsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- Losito v. Kruse, Jr.Ohio Supreme Court · 1940
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. TrowbridgeOhio Supreme Court · 1975
- Globe Indemnity Co. v. SchmittOhio Supreme Court · 1944
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Frederick Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Taylor v. Academy Iron & Metal Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1988
- Myco, Inc. v. Super Concrete Co., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
- Caygill v. JablonskiOhio Court of Appeals · 1992
- Convention Center Inn, Ltd. v. Dow Chemical Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1990
- MODLEY MACHINERY CO. v. Gray Supply Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.