Legal Opinion

Fleming v. Gardner

District Court, E.D. Tennessee

Decided December 18, 1978No. CIV-2-78-10PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

NEESE, District Judge.

The motion of the plaintiff Mr. Fleming for a protective order, Rule 26(c), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, prohibiting the release to counsel for the defendants of his medical records hereby is OVERRULED.

The defendants moved the Court for “ * * * an order requiring Bristol Memorial Hospital of Bristol, Tennessee, to produce and permit the defendants to inspect and copy or photograph the [e]mergency [r]oom records of hospitalization and treatment of * * * the plaintiff in this action. * * * ” In support thereof, the record herein reflects…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. United States v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Keohane v. Swarco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1963
  4. James Steven Hogg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1969
  5. Haaf v. GramsDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1973

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Virgil Cochran v. Francis J. Birkel, Virginia Hager, Bettie Klontz, and Kathy Rubens, All IndividuallyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1981
  2. Cooper Industries, Inc. v. British Aerospace, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1984
  3. In Re Anschuetz & Co., GmbhCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
  4. Smith v. Logansport Community School Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 1991
  5. Home Insurance v. First National Bank of RomeDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1980

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API