Legal Opinion

Virgil Cochran v. Francis J. Birkel, Virginia Hager, Bettie Klontz, and Kathy Rubens, All Individually

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided June 23, 1981No. 79-3205, 79-3206PublishedCited by 131 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ENGEL, Circuit Judge.

Virgil Cochran, proceeding pro se, brought suit on August 1, 1975, against Birkel and other individuals employed by the Summit County, Ohio, Welfare Department and the Ohio Department of Public Welfare charging that he and his son had been unlawfully deprived of food stamp and welfare benefits to which they were allegedly entitled. There is no indication that Cochran either served a separate demand for a jury trial on the defendants or incorporated a demand for a jury trial in his complaint. He did, however, place a check in a box on the Civil Cover Sheet indicating that…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Curtis v. LoetherSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Donovan Edward Ruby v. Secretary of the United States NavyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  4. Leonhard v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  5. City of Morgantown v. Royal InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by131 opinions

  1. In Re Bendectin Litigation.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1988
  2. Douglas S. Lewis v. George AlexanderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
  3. Inland Bulk Transfer Co. v. Cummins Engine Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  4. United States v. Quema HollowayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
  5. Michael Williamson v. Recovery Limited PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013

126 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API