Legal Opinion
Keohane v. Swarco, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided August 5, 1963No. Nos. 15284, 15334PublishedCited by 51 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WEICK, Circuit Judge.
Both of these appeals are from orders entered by the District Court in the same case. Appellees have moved to dismiss the appeal in No. 15,284 because it was prematurely filed and to dismiss the appeal in No. 15,334 because it was not timely filed.
The motion to dismiss in No. 15,284 was based upon the following original papers and docket entries:
November 27, 1962 — Memorandum opinion
November 30, 1962 — Order dismissing complaint
December 10, 1962 — Service by mail on defendants’ counsel of plaintiff’s motion for amended and additional findings of fact.
December 11, 1962 —…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. Crescent Amusement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Leishman v. Associated Wholesale Electric Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Reliance Life Ins. Co. v. BurgessCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corporation, a Corporation v. City of Seattle, Wash., a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Wilson Sporting Goods Co. v. David Geoffrey & Associates D/B/A Slazenger, and Dunlop Slazenger Corporation AKA Dunlop Sports CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- First National Bank of Salem, Ohio v. Harry D. HirschCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1976
- United States v. John Hitchmon, A/K/A John Ashanti, and Jessie Lee Fussell, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Quema HollowayCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- Daniel Workman v. Arthur Tate, (Workman Ii)Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.