Legal Opinion
Meiresonne v. Marriott Corp.
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided February 3, 1989No. 88 C 3716PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, District Judge.
Joyce Meiresonne (“Meiresonne”) and Toni Reedy (“Reedy”) have sued Marriott Corporation (“Marriott”), charging sex discrimination in employment in violation of Title YII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 as amended, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e to 2000e-17. Plaintiffs have moved under Fed.R.Civ.P. (“Rule”) 23 for certification of a class consisting of certain female employees in Marriott’s Food and Beverage (“F & B”) division. For the reasons stated in this memorandum opinion and order, the motion is granted.
Background
Meiresonne has been employed by…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Watson v. Fort Worth Bank & TrustSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Carlotta Rossini and Jane Zukofsky, on Behalf of Themselves and All Persons Similarly Situated v. Ogilvy & Mather, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Armstrong v. Chicago Park DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Buford v. H & R Block, Inc.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 1996
- Smith v. University of Washington Law SchoolDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1998
- Markham v. WhiteDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1997
- Smith v. Nike Retail Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2006
- McReynolds v. Sodexho Marriott Services, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2002
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.