Legal Opinion
Armstrong v. Chicago Park District
District Court, N.D. Illinois
Decided November 13, 1987No. 87 C 833PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
SHADUR, District Judge.
Dema Armstrong (“Armstrong”), Natalie Lyle (“Lyle”), Doris Shelby (“Shelby”) and Mary Robinson (“Robinson”) have sued the Chicago Park District (“District”) and several present and former District Commissioners and managers, charging sex discrimination in employment in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-5(f)(1) (“Title VII”) and 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (“Section 1983”). Plaintiffs have moved under Fed.R.Civ.P. (“Rule”) 23 for certification1 of a class for each claim.2 For the reasons discussed in this memorandum opinion and order, the motion is denied…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Wilson v. GarciaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Schlesinger v. Reservists Committee to Stop the WarSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- East Texas Motor Freight System, Inc. v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Dhamer v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1998
- Szczubelek v. Cendant Mortgage Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2003
- In re Live Concert Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2007
- Welch v. Board of DirectorsDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- Meiresonne v. Marriott Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.