Craig v. Decatur Petroleum Haulers, Inc.
Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
This is a workmen's compensation case. Plaintiff appeals from a judgment finding him not an employee of defendant Decatur Petroleum Haulers, Inc., hereinafter called Decatur. We reverse.
The trial court heard extensive oral testimony and made finding of facts and conclusion of law. A material part of the finding of fact appears in paragraphs 2 and 3 as follows:
"(2) The court further finds that the lease agreement between Edmonds and Decatur Petroleum provided for Edmonds to pay all costs of operating the vehicle, including the wages and other payment due by reason of owner's employment of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Tuscaloosa Veneer Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
- Stevens v. Deaton Truck Line, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1951
- National Labor Relations Board v. Deaton, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Deaton Truck Line, Inc. v. AckerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- C. E. Adams & Co. v. HarrellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1952
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- American Tennis Courts, Inc. v. HintonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1979
- Terry v. Read Steel ProductsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Pettaway v. Mobile Paint Mfg. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Fruehauf Corp. v. PraterCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978
- Candido v. Polymers, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1996
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.