Legal Opinion
City of Andalusia v. Alabama Utilities Co.
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided January 22, 1931No. 4 Div. 520PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.
By the bill the city of Andalusia seeks the specific performance of an option contract to purchase the waterworks and electric light plant serving the city and now owned by the respondents.
The option is embodied in an ordinance of April 30, 1904, entitled:
“An Ordinance.
“To provide for a public and private supply of water, electric light and power, in and near thé town of Andalusia, in the State of Alabama, and granting unto Frank Sutter and his associates, successors and assigns, the right to construct, operate, maintain and own, a water works and electric light and power plant in' said town…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Castle Creek Water Co. v. City of AspenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
- Town of Bristol v. Bristol & Warren Water WorksSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1896
- Grosvenor v. FlintSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1897
- Montgomery Gas-Light Co. v. City Council of MontgomerySupreme Court of Alabama · 1888
- Caldwell v. CaldwellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cowin v. SalmonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1943
- Saad v. SaadCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2009
- Lake Shore Power Co. v. EdgertonOhio Court of Appeals · 1932
- Montgomery v. FordSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933