Legal Opinion
United States v. Xinidakis
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 25, 2010No. 09-50307PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RYMER, Circuit Judge:
We must decide whether 18 U.S.C. § 3624(e) prohibits a district court from imposing consecutive sentences of imprisonment where a defendant violates concurrent terms of supervised release. Although we answered this question negatively in United States v. Jackson, 176 F.3d 1175 (9th Cir.1999) (per curiam), David Xinidakis argues that Jackson has been undermined by the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v. United States, 529 U.S. 694, 120 S.Ct. 1795, 146 L.Ed.2d 727 (2000). We disagree. Jackson remains the law of this circuit, and controls. Multiple…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Miller v. GammieCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- United States of America v. Modesto GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. DeesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- United States v. Cesar BecerraCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Michelle WingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Roger Campbell, IICourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Mark HertlerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- USA V. JAMES RICHARDSCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.