United States v. Michelle Wing
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOSKOWITZ, District Judge:
Michelle Wing appeals the district court’s revocation of her second term of supervised release, which had not yet commenced, based on newly discovered violations of conditions of her previously revoked first term of supervised release. Wing contends that the district court *863lacked jurisdiction to revoke her second term of supervised release. In this matter of first impression, we conclude that a district court lacks jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 3583(e)(3) to revoke a term of supervised release based on newly discovered violations of a previously revoked term…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Food & Drug Administration v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mario Roberto FUENTES-BARAHONA, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. KnightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- American Bankers Ass'n v. GouldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. Marcus HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
- CIC-TOC Pension Plan v. Weyerhaeuser Co.District Court, D. Oregon · 2012
- United States v. Robert CrossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
- Davis v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
- Davis v. United States District Court for the Northern District of California, San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2025
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.