Legal Opinion

United States v. Mark Hertler

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 15, 2015No. 13-30273PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAEZ, Circuit Judge:

Defendant Mark William Hertler appeals a postrevoeation term of supervised release. He argues that the new term of twenty months exceeds the maximum period that can be imposed under 18 U.S.C. § 3588(h). That subsection authorizes a district court to impose a postrevocation term of supervised release up to the statutory maximum, but requires the court to reduce the length of supervised release by “any term of imprisonment that was imposed upon revocation of supervised release.” Hertler contends that the phrase “any term of imprisonment” in § 3583(h) refers to any…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Albernaz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Muscarello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  3. Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Moskal v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. United States v. Keith Everett MaxwellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. EdlingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  2. United States v. Hans EdlingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  3. United States v. Hans EdlingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  4. United States v. Muneeb AkhterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API