Legal Opinion

Rhoten v. Dickson

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided September 26, 2008No. 98,837PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hill, J.:

When discovery revealed the man who struck Danielle Rhoten’s car was not aware a Topeka police officer was chasing him, the federal court dismissed Danielle Rhoten’s civil rights complaint against the City of Topeka and one of its police officers. The federal judge found no causal connection between the police officer’s acts and Rhoten’s injury. After that ruling, the federal court declined to hear Rhoten’s state negligence claims, and she filed a lawsuit against the City and the officer in Shawnee District Court. Now, we must decide whether the legal doctrines of res judicata,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Robbins Ex Rel. Robbins v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
  2. Murray v. EDWARDS CTY. SHERIFF'S DEPT.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  3. Mattson v. City of Costa MesaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
  4. Robbins v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
  5. City of Arkansas City v. BrutonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rhoten v. DicksonSupreme Court of Kansas · 2010
  2. Herington v. City of WichitaSupreme Court of Kansas · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API