Legal Opinion
Maine National Bank v. Baker
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided March 31, 1976No. 7286PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, J.
The plaintiff excepted to orders denying its motion to amend a writ of attachment authorized ex parte on Decern*186ber 19, 1974, pursuant to RSA 511-A:8 (Supp. 1975) governing ex parte attachments. The issues of law presented by the plaintiff’s exceptions were reserved and transferred by Cann, J.
According to the petition for attachment, the defendant executed a promissory note, on July 26, 1974, in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $2,000. The note evidenced a loan in like amount and was payable on demand thirty days from date. The petition recited that in accordance with the terms of the note…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Mitchell v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Newton Oil Co. v. BockholdSupreme Court of Colorado · 1946
- Robinson v. RobinsonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Diane Holly Corp. v. Bruno & Stillman Yacht Co., Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1983
- ALEX BUILDERS & SONS, INC. v. DanleySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
- Chi Shun Hua Steel Co., Ltd. v. Crest Tankers, Inc.District Court, D. New Hampshire · 1989
- P. J. Currier Lumber Co. v. Stonemill Construction Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- Topjian Plumbing & Heating, Inc. v. Bruce Topjian, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.