Legal Opinion
Oberti ex rel. Oberti v. Board of Education
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided May 28, 1993No. 92-5462PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
BECKER, Circuit Judge.
The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1485 (formerly the “Education for All Handicapped Children Act”), provides that states receiving funding under the Act must ensure that children with disabilities are educated in regular classrooms with nondisabled children “to the maximum extent appropriate.” 20 U.S.C. § 1412(5)(B). Plaintiff-appellee Rafael Ober-ti is an eight year old child with Down’s syndrome who was removed from the regular classroom by defendant-appellant Clementon School District Board of Education (the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Honig v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Southeastern Community College v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Roland M. And Miriam M. v. The Concord School CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Oberti v. Board Of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Mavis v. SobolDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1994
- Delaware County Intermediate Unit 25 v. Martin K.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
- Weaver v. Millbrook Central School DistrictDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Murray ex rel. Murray v. Montrose County School District RE-1JCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995