Legal Opinion
Delaware County Intermediate Unit 25 v. Martin K.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 15, 1993No. Civ. A. 92-3866PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBRENO, District Judge.
This matter involves a child’s right to a free appropriate public education under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (the “IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. After a bench trial, and pursuant to Fed. R.Civ.P. 52, the Court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law. 1 '
1. FINDINGS OF FACT
Paul K., born on July 24,1988, is the minor son of defendants Martin and Melinda K. 2 When Paul was two, he was diagnosed as suffering from “pervasive development disorder—not otherwise specified.” Pervasive development disorder (“PDD”) is…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Honig v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- School Committee of the Town of Burlington v. Department of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Roland M. And Miriam M. v. The Concord School CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Mairin Doyle Brian Doyle Margaret Doyle v. Arlington County School Board, and Arthur W. Gosling John S. Davis Virginia Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Amanda J., a Minor, by and Through Her Guardian Ad Litem, Annette J. v. Clark County School District, and Nevada State Department of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Michael C. v. Radnor Township School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
- Mavis v. SobolDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1994
- Sytsema Ex Rel. Sytsema v. Academy School District No. 20Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- TH v. Board of Educ. of PalatineDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.