Legal Opinion

Drake v. Hodgson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 25, 1924PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Finch, J.:

Whether the complaint states facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and the defenses contained in the answer and supplemental answer are sufficient in law, are the questions presented by this appeal. The facts, in so far as necessary to call attention to the questions involved, are briefly as follows: The complaint alleges that while the four defendants were copartners in the stock brokerage business, the plaintiff deposited with them securities as collateral in connection with the purchase and sale of stock; that as the account stood on December 31, 1911, the plaintiff…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States National Bank v. UnderwoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  2. Akin v. Van WirtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908
  3. Briggs v. . Briggs and VoseNew York Court of Appeals · 1857
  4. Drake v. HodgsonNew York Supreme Court · 1922

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sitchenko v. DiRestaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1981
  2. Kaydee Sales Corp. v. FeldmanNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  3. S & L Paving Corp. v. MacMurray Tractor, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Saenz v. New York Tribune, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1936
  5. Bank of United States v. MoskowitzCity of New York Municipal Court · 1934

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API