Legal Opinion

Bank of United States v. Moskowitz

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided January 6, 1934PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNoonan, J.

The case was tried before the court without a jury. There are seven causes of action set out in the complaint, all of which are based on promissory notes made by the defendants as copartners and indorsed by the copartnership to the plaintiff bank. These notes are for various sums of money, totaling $6,250. The first note sued upon is dated August 18, 1930, and the last note is dated December 1, 1930, the five other notes bearing intermediate dates.

The complaint alleges that the principal of the first three notes sued upon has been paid, and each cause of action on these notes is for interest…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Millerd v. . ThornNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  2. National Park Bank v. . KoehlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1912
  3. Farmers' Bank of Amsterdam v. BlairNew York Supreme Court · 1865
  4. Brown v. WilliamsNew York Supreme Court · 1830
  5. Trimble v. ThorneNew York Supreme Court · 1819

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lincoln First Bank, N.A. v. Miraglia (In Re Miraglia)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. New York · 1981
  2. 500 Fifth Avenue, Inc. v. NielsenCivil Court of the City of New York · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API