Legal Opinion

Drake v. Hodgson

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1922PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action to recover balance alleged to be due from firm of stockbrokers.

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, J.

This action is brought to recover the sum of $204,601.27, the balance alleged to be due plaintiff from defendants on account of certain stock transactions with the defendants stockbrokers. The action is brought on the theory that the defendant Joseph H. Hodgson, the only defendant served, is liable as surety, as a retiring partner, on certain transactions had with the firm of Gay & Sturgis, of which originally he was a member. The amended complaint alleges that from about July 1, 1910, to and including December 31, 1911, the defendants Hodgson, Gay, Sturgis and Hall were copartners engaged ia…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Colgrove v. . TallmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1876
  2. Elmira Iron & Steel Rolling Mill Co. v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. De Witt v. MonjoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  4. Reed & Barton v. AsheAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  5. Davis v. . KeyesNew York Court of Appeals · 1868

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Sitchenko v. DiRestaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1981
  2. Drake v. HodgsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API