Legal Opinion
Harold E. Harrington v. United States
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided October 24, 1974No. 74-1163PublishedCited by 111 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLARY, Senior District Judge.
This appeal has been taken by plaintiffs , Harold Harrington and Francis Davis, from the entry of judgment against them in favor of the United States and from the denial of their motion for a new trial. These two civil actions were consolidated and tried before The Honorable Edward W. Day and a six-person jury resulting in verdicts against the plaintiffs on their claims for refunds and in favor of the United States on its counterclaims. For the reasons set forth in this opinion, we affirm.
The relevant facts require some exposition. On November 4, 1966, the…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Robert W. Monday v. United States of America, and Third-Party v. John A. Monday, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1970
- J. A. Newsome, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Edward J. Bloom v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960
- Billy Ray Delancey v. Motichek Towing Service, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Richard Gray v. Shell Oil Company, Shell Oil Company, Cross-Appellant v. Richard Gray, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by111 opinions
- Wagenmann v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Judith Brochu and Emmanuel T. Brochu v. Ortho Pharmaceutical CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- James A. McKinnon v. Skil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Eric Wilson v. Maritime Overseas Corporation and Cambridge Tankers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
- Robert H. CALHOUN, Plaintiff, Appellee, v. ACME CLEVELAND CORPORATION and the Cleveland Twist Drill Company, Defendants, AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1986
106 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.